Explain the difference between motivational interviewing and a coercive approach.

Motivational Interviewing and a Coercive Approach are two different methods used to influence behavior change.

1. Motivational Interviewing: This is a client-centered counseling style that aims to enhance a person's motivation to change by exploring and resolving ambivalence. The focus is on promoting the individual's own voice and aspirations, supporting autonomy, and strengthening personal motivation for and commitment to change. It is a collaborative process where the counselor and the client work together to decide on the best course of action.

2. Coercive Approach: This method, on the other hand, involves the use of force or threats to bring about behavior change. It is a more directive and controlling approach, where the person is told what to do and how to do it. The focus is on compliance and obedience, rather than personal motivation and autonomy. This approach can often lead to resistance and defensiveness, and may not result in long-term behavior change.

In summary, the main difference between motivational interviewing and a coercive approach lies in the way they engage with the individual. Motivational interviewing is more about collaboration and empowerment, while a coercive approach is about control and compliance.