Case of Maneka Gandhi had its ruling related to1 pointfreedom of speech & expressionright to lifeRight to EqualityAll of the above

The case of Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) is a landmark ruling in Indian constitutional law and is significant for its interpretation of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution of India. The Supreme Court's ruling in this case expanded the understanding of several rights, particularly the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21.

1. Right to Life and Personal Liberty: The court held that the right to life and personal liberty cannot be restricted except by a valid law and that any law providing for such restrictions must also be just, fair, and reasonable.

2. Freedom of Speech and Expression: The ruling also related to the right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19, ensuring that individuals have the ability to express themselves freely.

3. Right to Equality: The judgment touched upon the principle of equality before the law and the importance of non-discrimination.

Given that the decision impacted various provisions of fundamental rights, the correct answer is:

All of the above.

This illustrates the case's comprehensive reach in upholding multiple fundamental rights in the Indian Constitution, making it a critical case for civil liberties.