How does Ted Steinberg explain the rise of the present widespread perception of ‘naturaldisasters’ as random natural events that lie beyond human control?

Ted Steinberg, in his work, challenges the conventional understanding of 'natural disasters' as random and uncontrollable events. He argues that these disasters are not entirely natural, but are significantly influenced by human activities and decisions.

1. Human Impact on Environment: Steinberg points out that human activities such as deforestation, urbanization, and industrialization have significantly altered the natural environment. These changes have increased the frequency and intensity of certain disasters like floods and landslides.

2. Economic and Political Factors: Steinberg also highlights the role of economic and political factors in shaping the impact of these disasters. For instance, decisions about land use, building codes, and disaster management policies can either mitigate or exacerbate the effects of these events.

3. Social Construction of Disasters: Furthermore, Steinberg argues that the perception of these events as 'natural disasters' is a social construct. By labeling them as 'natural', society absolves itself of responsibility for these disasters and their aftermath.

4. The Role of Media: The media also plays a significant role in shaping this perception. By focusing on the uncontrollable aspects of these events, the media often overlooks the human factors that contribute to these disasters.

In conclusion, Steinberg explains the rise of the present widespread perception of 'natural disasters' as random natural events that lie beyond human control by highlighting the significant role of human activities, economic and political decisions, social constructs, and media portrayals in shaping this perception.