The geographic fit of the continents is one of the pieces of evidence used to prove continental drift. Which of the following supports this evidence?

The text seems to be missing, but I'll provide a general answer to your question.

The geographic fit of the continents is indeed one of the pieces of evidence used to support the theory of continental drift. This theory, proposed by Alfred Wegener in the early 20th century, suggests that the continents were once a single landmass, called Pangaea, that broke apart and drifted to their current positions.

The following points support this evidence:

1. Puzzle-like Fit: If you look at a world map, you can see that the eastern coast of South America and the western coast of Africa look like they could fit together like puzzle pieces. This is not a coincidence, but a result of continental drift.

2. Fossil Evidence: Fossils of the same species of plants and animals have been found on continents that are now separated by vast oceans. This suggests that these continents were once connected, allowing these species to inhabit these areas.

3. Rock Formations and Mountain Chains: Similar rock formations and mountain chains have been found on continents that are now far apart. This suggests that these landmasses were once connected and shared the same geological features.

4. Paleoclimate Evidence: Evidence of similar past climates, such as glacial deposits and desert belts, have been found on continents that are now in very different climate zones. This suggests that these continents were once located in the same climate zone and have since drifted apart.

5. Seafloor Spreading: The discovery of seafloor spreading in the mid-20th century provided further evidence for continental drift. As new crust is formed at mid-ocean ridges and spreads outwards, it pushes the continents apart.

These pieces of evidence collectively support the theory of continental drift and the idea that the continents were once a single landmass.