fforts to expand Security Council membership have failed because countries cannot decide on how it should be done. true false

True.

Efforts to expand United Nations Security Council (UNSC) membership have indeed faced significant challenges and ultimately failed primarily due to disagreements among member states on the criteria and process for expansion. Various countries have different priorities regarding which nations should be granted permanent or non-permanent seats, reflecting their geopolitical interests.

For instance, nations like India, Brazil, Germany, and Japan have lobbied for permanent membership, citing their economic and diplomatic contributions. However, other countries argue against such expansions, fearing a dilution of their influence and the potential for creating a bloc of powerful nations that may not represent the broader interests of the international community.

Moreover, the process requires a two-thirds majority of the General Assembly and the concurrence of all five permanent members (the United States, Russia, China, France, and the United Kingdom), which adds to the complexity. The lack of a unified stance among these nations has led to a stalemate, effectively halting any progress towards reforming the Security Council's composition. Thus, the assertion is true.