How do you prefer to receive feedback on your work and performance? (e.g., regular meetings, written feedback, peer review, etc.)

I prefer to receive feedback on my work and performance through a combination of methods to ensure a well-rounded understanding of my strengths and areas for improvement. Regular meetings allow for immediate and interactive discussions, where I can engage in dialogue and ask questions for clarification. Written feedback provides a documented reference I can review later, which is particularly useful for detailed observations.

Peer reviews are valuable as they offer diverse perspectives and insights from colleagues who may approach tasks differently. I also appreciate constructive criticism that highlights specific examples, as this helps me grasp practical applications for improvement. Overall, a blend of these methods fosters a comprehensive feedback loop that can enhance my performance and professional development.